Quantcast
Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel


Embed this content in your HTML

Search

Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Showcase


Channel Catalog



Channel Description:

Live RSS feed for /fit

older | 1 | .... | 493 | 494 | (Page 495) | 496 | 497 | .... | 987 | newer

    0 0
  • 09/16/18--17:07: 23330

  • 0 0
  • 09/16/18--18:06: 23331
  • >>23325
    it's kinda simple in reality. more volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and faster approaching overreaching in the long term).
    That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever). But in practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible.


    0 0
  • 09/16/18--18:21: 23332
  • >>23325
    It's kinda simple in reality. More volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and for increasing the time that occurs every time before approaching the overreaching state, before having to take a deload).

    That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever), even in the last "45 sets to failure x week for quads" study! BUT if it isn't the same for you, then all you are doing is losing time doing junk volume, overreaching sooner and increasing injury risk tenfolds. If those subjects didn't manage to increase their strength, i can bet they would not realize that much hypertrophy, probably lot of edema, intracellular water, increased glycogen storages, etc.. (sarcoplasmic hypertrophy we could call it).

    In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible, there is no fucking need to study it again, and all the inter variability in muscle hypertrophy response during these such studies demonstrated this very clearly.


    0 0
  • 09/16/18--21:13: 23333
  • Anyone has Primal method by Chris bridgeford?


    0 0
  • 09/16/18--23:15: 23334
  • Anyone have the updated version of Hybrid 5 with Calisthenics by VitruvianPhysique?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--00:03: 23335
  • >>23327
    Hi mate. Awesome contribution, thank you so much!


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--02:08: 23336
  • Does anyone have barbell medicine 4 day 7 week hypertrophy template without the errors?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--02:59: 23337
  • >>23332

    >In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach.

    > there is no fucking need to study it again

    I think we're on the same page here.

    Who the hell has time for 45 sets per week?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--03:30: 23338
  • >>23327

    Awesome share, thank you to both yourself and Trunks.


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--04:53: 23339
  • does anyone have armwrestling ebooks
    thanks


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--05:09: 23340
  • Im gonna go and ask a difficult one.
    If anyone has the RTS Manual from Reactive Training Systems , it would be great.Or any of their stuff.
    Also , if i share my Google Drive, is it safe? Can anyone make any changes to it?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--06:14: 23341
  • 0 0
  • 09/17/18--06:30: 23342
  • https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qH_xHHKmScUsKEfP26RkOQ0CHqmy075v?usp=sharing
    >>23341
    Most of it is uploaded , but its my Drive of Copies.
    It isnt everything uploaded on this thread, just what i think is worthwhile.
    If anyone wants i have the P90X,P90X2,P90X3,MI40,MI40X,ATHLEANX,BodyBeast , programs not uploaded, but i can share.


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--06:30: 23343
  • Does anyone have any programs from SSPT?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--08:53: 23344
  • >>23342

    What Athlean-X programs do you have?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--09:24: 23345
  • Unfortunately i just checked, and nothing that hasnt been posted here before.
    my bad
    although i came across some things a while ago , i didnt think they were worth while and didnt save them.


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--09:39: 23346
  • https://thibarmy.com/product/maximum-muscle-bible/
    https://thibarmy.com/product/black-book-of-training-secrets/
    Anyone got thibarmy maximum muscle bible and black book of training secrets?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--09:55: 23347
  • >>23346

    https://anonfile.com/e8D2Aeh1b5/Christian_Thibaudeau_-_Black_Book_of_Trainings_Secrets_Enhanced_Edition_pdf

    The other book you'll probably be waiting a while like the rest as it appears to be print only so will require someone to scan 188 or so pages. Would be great if an ebook version does materialise, whoever posts it will get many virtual man hugs and big ups


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--10:11: 23348
  • Anyone got the new Kizen Sheiko 3 day a week program?


    0 0
  • 09/17/18--16:02: 23349
  • https://hypertrophymastery.com/?_ga=2.13369652.22833925.1537222096-527954516.1537222096
    Anyone got ben pakukski hypertrophy execution masterclass


older | 1 | .... | 493 | 494 | (Page 495) | 496 | 497 | .... | 987 | newer