23330
↧
↧
23331
>>23325
it's kinda simple in reality. more volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and faster approaching overreaching in the long term).
That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever). But in practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible.
it's kinda simple in reality. more volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and faster approaching overreaching in the long term).
That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever). But in practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible.
↧
23332
>>23325
It's kinda simple in reality. More volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and for increasing the time that occurs every time before approaching the overreaching state, before having to take a deload).
That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever), even in the last "45 sets to failure x week for quads" study! BUT if it isn't the same for you, then all you are doing is losing time doing junk volume, overreaching sooner and increasing injury risk tenfolds. If those subjects didn't manage to increase their strength, i can bet they would not realize that much hypertrophy, probably lot of edema, intracellular water, increased glycogen storages, etc.. (sarcoplasmic hypertrophy we could call it).
In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible, there is no fucking need to study it again, and all the inter variability in muscle hypertrophy response during these such studies demonstrated this very clearly.
It's kinda simple in reality. More volume is better ONLY when it's not slowing the rate of progression on the mechanical tension aspect. for example, if A is progressing at 5% every week (strength wise) with 10 sets x week and we increase his volume to 20 x week and he is STILL progressing at at least 5% every week, then more volume here is better (at least in the SHORT TERM..). But if subject B progress 5% every week at 10 sets x week and at 20 he is just progressing slower or not at all, then lower volume is better. The key is the highest volume with which you can progress the most, and probably a little lower (for reducing injury risk and for increasing the time that occurs every time before approaching the overreaching state, before having to take a deload).
That's the thing, in every Schoenfeld study or whatever, the subjects, even with that high volume, are still increasing weight/reps every week on the exercises (for whatever reason, it can be more motivation, more rest, whatever), even in the last "45 sets to failure x week for quads" study! BUT if it isn't the same for you, then all you are doing is losing time doing junk volume, overreaching sooner and increasing injury risk tenfolds. If those subjects didn't manage to increase their strength, i can bet they would not realize that much hypertrophy, probably lot of edema, intracellular water, increased glycogen storages, etc.. (sarcoplasmic hypertrophy we could call it).
In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach. It's always been the art of finding that sweet spot for that particular subject, there is no fucking perfect number of sets x week for everyone, it's impossible, there is no fucking need to study it again, and all the inter variability in muscle hypertrophy response during these such studies demonstrated this very clearly.
↧
23333
Anyone has Primal method by Chris bridgeford?
↧
23334
Anyone have the updated version of Hybrid 5 with Calisthenics by VitruvianPhysique?
↧
↧
23335
↧
23336
Does anyone have barbell medicine 4 day 7 week hypertrophy template without the errors?
↧
23337
>>23332
>In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach.
> there is no fucking need to study it again
I think we're on the same page here.
Who the hell has time for 45 sets per week?
>In practice, if a subject is not progressing in strenght (weight/reps/..), then all that high volume is useless. Much better a lower volume approach.
> there is no fucking need to study it again
I think we're on the same page here.
Who the hell has time for 45 sets per week?
↧
23338
↧
↧
23339
does anyone have armwrestling ebooks
thanks
thanks
↧
23340
Im gonna go and ask a difficult one.
If anyone has the RTS Manual from Reactive Training Systems , it would be great.Or any of their stuff.
Also , if i share my Google Drive, is it safe? Can anyone make any changes to it?
If anyone has the RTS Manual from Reactive Training Systems , it would be great.Or any of their stuff.
Also , if i share my Google Drive, is it safe? Can anyone make any changes to it?
↧
23341
>>23340
https://anonfile.com/d8pfY4gdb5/RTS_Directions_for_spreadsheets_doc
https://anonfile.com/e9p9Y8gfb4/RTS_Planner_xls
https://anonfile.com/f4p3Y2g1b5/RTS_Log_Fatigue_xls
https://anonfile.com/g5paY6gabd/RTS_Log_Frequency_xls
https://anonfile.com/k5p5Y6geb3/Mike_Tuchscherer_-_Reactive_Training_Manual_pdf
https://anonfile.com/40p4Yfg9be/Radical_Individualization_with_Mike_Tuchscherer_MP4
https://anonfile.com/d8pfY4gdb5/RTS_Directions_for_spreadsheets_doc
https://anonfile.com/e9p9Y8gfb4/RTS_Planner_xls
https://anonfile.com/f4p3Y2g1b5/RTS_Log_Fatigue_xls
https://anonfile.com/g5paY6gabd/RTS_Log_Frequency_xls
https://anonfile.com/k5p5Y6geb3/Mike_Tuchscherer_-_Reactive_Training_Manual_pdf
https://anonfile.com/40p4Yfg9be/Radical_Individualization_with_Mike_Tuchscherer_MP4
↧
23342
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qH_xHHKmScUsKEfP26RkOQ0CHqmy075v?usp=sharing
>>23341
Most of it is uploaded , but its my Drive of Copies.
It isnt everything uploaded on this thread, just what i think is worthwhile.
If anyone wants i have the P90X,P90X2,P90X3,MI40,MI40X,ATHLEANX,BodyBeast , programs not uploaded, but i can share.
>>23341
Most of it is uploaded , but its my Drive of Copies.
It isnt everything uploaded on this thread, just what i think is worthwhile.
If anyone wants i have the P90X,P90X2,P90X3,MI40,MI40X,ATHLEANX,BodyBeast , programs not uploaded, but i can share.
↧
↧
23343
Does anyone have any programs from SSPT?
↧
23344
↧
23345
Unfortunately i just checked, and nothing that hasnt been posted here before.
my bad
although i came across some things a while ago , i didnt think they were worth while and didnt save them.
my bad
although i came across some things a while ago , i didnt think they were worth while and didnt save them.
↧
23346
https://thibarmy.com/product/maximum-muscle-bible/
https://thibarmy.com/product/black-book-of-training-secrets/
Anyone got thibarmy maximum muscle bible and black book of training secrets?
https://thibarmy.com/product/black-book-of-training-secrets/
Anyone got thibarmy maximum muscle bible and black book of training secrets?
↧
↧
23347
>>23346
https://anonfile.com/e8D2Aeh1b5/Christian_Thibaudeau_-_Black_Book_of_Trainings_Secrets_Enhanced_Edition_pdf
The other book you'll probably be waiting a while like the rest as it appears to be print only so will require someone to scan 188 or so pages. Would be great if an ebook version does materialise, whoever posts it will get many virtual man hugs and big ups
https://anonfile.com/e8D2Aeh1b5/Christian_Thibaudeau_-_Black_Book_of_Trainings_Secrets_Enhanced_Edition_pdf
The other book you'll probably be waiting a while like the rest as it appears to be print only so will require someone to scan 188 or so pages. Would be great if an ebook version does materialise, whoever posts it will get many virtual man hugs and big ups
↧
23348
Anyone got the new Kizen Sheiko 3 day a week program?
↧
23349
https://hypertrophymastery.com/?_ga=2.13369652.22833925.1537222096-527954516.1537222096
Anyone got ben pakukski hypertrophy execution masterclass
Anyone got ben pakukski hypertrophy execution masterclass
↧
