>>16423
Because the thread is riddled with dead links, and when threads get too big they can fuck over the site, mechanically speaking. They're also a bitch to navigate since the [Last 50 posts] and [Next 100 posts] etc are broken as hell.
As for your community argument, we have another thread exactly like this on /tg/ which we have had to reset twice for this exact reason. >>/tg/69896
It's barely even phased them. It'll be ok.
>>16424
k
Because the thread is riddled with dead links, and when threads get too big they can fuck over the site, mechanically speaking. They're also a bitch to navigate since the [Last 50 posts] and [Next 100 posts] etc are broken as hell.
As for your community argument, we have another thread exactly like this on /tg/ which we have had to reset twice for this exact reason. >>/tg/69896
It's barely even phased them. It'll be ok.
>>16424
k